当前位置:首页 / 基于柯氏模型评价以团体标准《非生物型人工肝血管通路建立与维护规范》(T/GXAS 487—2023)为核心的血管通路维护培训效果的研究▲
| 更新时间:2026-07-13
|
基于柯氏模型评价以团体标准《非生物型人工肝血管通路建立与维护规范》(T/GXAS 487—2023)为核心的血管通路维护培训效果的研究▲
Kirkpatrick model-based evaluation of effectiveness of vascular access maintenance training-centered on the group standard Specification for Establishment and Maintenance of Vascular Access in Non‑Bioartificial Liver Support (T/GXAS 487—2023)

内科 页码:344-349

作者机构:广西中医药大学第二附属医院,广西南宁市 530011

基金信息::广西医疗卫生适宜技术开发与推广应用项目(S2021079) 通信作者:李桂凤

DOI:10.16121/j.cnki.cn45-1347/r.2026.03.14

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 基于柯氏模型评价以团体标准《非生物型人工肝血管通路建立与维护规范》(T/GXAS 487—2023)为核心的血管通路维护培训效果,为专科护理标准的临床转化提供依据。方法 选择南宁市某三甲医院加强监护病房38名护士为培训对象。以团体标准《非生物型人工肝血管通路建立与维护规范》(TGXAS 487-2023)为核心构建血管通路维护培训方案,采用“理论授课+情景模拟+分组讨论”模式实施教学。基于柯氏模型评价培训的效果:反应层,参训护士对培训的满意率;学习层,参训护士培训前后护理态度与理论知识;行为层,参训护士培训前后护理行为;结果层,参训护士培训前后护理的患者(培训前,A组,30例;培训后,B组,30例)血管通路相关并发症发生情况及满意率。结果 参训护士对教学内容、形式及环境的满意率分别为97.37%、94.74%及92.11%。培训后,参训护士护理态度评分及理论知识测试得分均较培训前提高(均P<0.05);日常维护、导管冲管与封管技术、敷料更换与穿刺部位保护、并发症的预防与处理、拔管指征与处置5项行为评分均优于培训前(均P<0.05)。B组患者血管通路相关并发症总发生率(6.67%)低于A组(33.33%)(P<0.05);B组患者对血管通路维护的满意率(96.67%)高于A组(83.33%),但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 基于柯氏模型的评估证实,以团体标准《非生物型人工肝血管通路建立与维护规范》(T/GXAS 487—2023)为核心的血管通路维护培训能有效提升护士的专业素养与规范执行能力,实现从“知识掌握”到“行为改善”再到“患者获益”的转化,具有显著的临床应用价值。

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of vascular access maintenance training centered on the group standard Specification for Establishment and Maintenance of Vascular Access in Non‑Bioartificial Liver Support (T/GXAS 487—2023) using the Kirkpatrick model, and to provide evidence for the clinical translation of specialized nursing standards. Methods A total of 38 intensive care unit nurses from a class A tertiary hospital in Nanning were selected as training participants. A vascular access maintenance training program was developed with the group standard Specification for Establishment and Maintenance of Vascular Access in Non‑Bioartificial Liver Support (T/GXAS 487—2023) as the core, and it was delivered through a combined teaching model of "theoretical lectures + scenario‑based simulation + group discussion." The training effectiveness was evaluated based on the Kirkpatrick model: at the reaction level, participating nurses' satisfaction rate with the training; at the learning level, participating nurses' nursing attitudes and theoretical knowledge before and after training; at the behavior level, participating nurses' nursing practices before and after training; and at the results level, the incidence of vascular access‑related complications and satisfaction rates of patients cared for by the participating nurses before (Group A, 30 cases) and after (Group B, 30 cases) the training. Results The participating nurses' satisfaction rates with the teaching content, modes, and environment were 97.37%, 94.74%, and 92.11%, respectively. After training, the participating nurses achieved significantly higher scores in nursing attitude and theoretical knowledge examinations than before the training (all P<0.05); the behavioral scores for five items—routine maintenance, catheter flushing and locking techniques, dressing changes and puncture site protection, complication prevention and management, and extubation indications and management—were all better than before (all P<0.05). The total incidence of vascular access‑related complications in Group B (6.67%) was lower than that in Group A (33.33%) (P<0.05), and the satisfaction rate with vascular access maintenance in Group B (96.67%) was higher than that in Group A (83.33%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion The Kirkpatrick model-based evaluation confirms that the vascular access maintenance training centered on the group standard Specification for Establishment and Maintenance of Vascular Access in Non‑Bioartificial Liver Support (T/GXAS 487—2023) can effectively enhance nurses' professional competence and standard implementation ability, achieving the translation from "knowledge acquisition" to "behavioral improvement" and ultimately to "patient benefit", with significant clinical application value.

8

浏览量

2

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集