当前位置:首页 / 痴呆与便秘的因果关系:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究
大数据与生物信息学 | 更新时间:2026-05-06
|
痴呆与便秘的因果关系:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究
Causal relationship between dementia and constipation: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

内科 页码:215-221

作者机构:重庆医科大学附属璧山医院全科医学科,重庆市璧山区 402760

DOI:10.16121/j.cnki.cn45-1347/r.2026.02.14

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 采用两样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析方法,系统探究痴呆与便秘之间的潜在因果关系。方法 从FinnGen数据库中提取痴呆(暴露因素)与便秘(结局变量)的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)汇总数据,严格筛选与暴露因素强相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)作为工具变量。采用逆方差加权(IVW)法作为主要分析方法,结合加权中位数估计(WME)法、MR-Egger回归法及加权模式(WM)法4种MR分析方法进行因果效应估计。采用MR-Egger回归截距项及MR-PRESSO全局检验评估水平多效性,采用Cochran Q检验评估工具变量间的异质性,采用留一法敏感性分析评估单个SNP对总体因果效应的影响,并采用Steiger方向性检验验证因果关系方向。结果 最终筛选出16个合格SNP作为工具变量纳入分析。IVW法结果显示,痴呆与便秘之间存在统计学意义上的正向因果关系(OR=1.037,95%CI:1.008~1.067,P=0.012);WME法及WM法所得结果与IVW法方向一致且均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);MR-Egger回归法的效应估计虽未达到统计学显著性,但其结果方向与IVW法结果一致(OR=1.026,95%CI:0.983~1.071,P=0.259)。MR-Egger回归截距项及MR-PRESSO全局检验均未提示存在统计学意义上的水平多效性(均P>0.05);Cochran Q检验显示各工具变量间无统计学意义上的异质性(P>0.05);留一法敏感性分析结果显示,剔除任一SNP均未对总体因果效应产生显著影响,提示本研究的因果效应估计并非由单个SNP驱动;Steiger方向性检验显示“痴呆→便秘”的因果假设方向成立。结论 基于MR分析的遗传学证据支持痴呆与便秘之间存在正向因果关联,提示痴呆可能是便秘发生的危险因素。

Objective To systematically explore the potential causal relationship between dementia and constipation using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Methods Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data of dementia (exposure factor) and constipation (outcome variable) were extracted from the FinnGen database, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) strongly associated with the exposure factor were strictly screened out as instrumental variables. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was employed as the primary analytical approach to estimate causal effects, complemented by weighted median estimation (WME) method, MR-Egger regression method, and weighted mode (WM) method. The MR-Egger regression intercept and MR-PRESSO global test were used to evaluate horizontal pleiotropy; Cochran's Q test was applied to assess heterogeneity among instrumental variables; leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of an individual SNP on the overall causal effect; Steiger directionality test was used to verify the causal relationship direction. Results A total of 16 qualified SNPs were finally included in this study as instrumental variables. The IVW method results indicated a statistically significant positive causal relationship between dementia and constipation (OR=1.037, 95%CI: 1.008-1.067, P=0.012). The results obtained using the WME and WM methods were consistent with those of the IVW method in direction and both were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Although the causal effect estimation from the MR-Egger regression method did not reach statistical significance, its direction was consistent with the IVW method (OR=1.026, 95%CI: 0.983-1.071, P=0.259). Neither MR-Egger regression intercept nor MR-PRESSO global test suggested statistically significant horizontal pleiotropy (all P>0.05); Cochran's Q test showed no statistically significant heterogeneity among instrumental variables (P>0.05). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis demonstrated that removing an single SNP did not substantially alter the overall causal effect, indicating the causal effect estimation was not driven by an individual SNP. The Steiger directionality test supported the causal hypothesis direction of “dementia → constipation”. Conclusion Genetic evidence from MR analysis supports a positive causal association between dementia and constipation, suggesting that dementia may be a risk factor for constipation.

1

浏览量

0

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集