当前位置:首页 / 基于2D-SWE评价扶正化瘀胶囊联合恩替卡韦对慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化的治疗效果▲
| 更新时间:2026-09-14
|
基于2D-SWE评价扶正化瘀胶囊联合恩替卡韦对慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化的治疗效果▲
2D‑SWE-based evaluation of the treatment effect of Fuzheng Huayu capsules combined with entecavir on chronic hepatitis B‑related liver fibrosis

内科 页码:369-379

作者机构:广西中医药大学第一附属医院,广西南宁市 530023

基金信息:国家自然科学基金(82260907);广西中医药适宜技术开发与推广项目(GZSY23-30);广西壮族自治区中医药管理局自筹经费科研课题(GZZC2019056) 通信作者:刘雪玲

DOI:10.16121/j.cnki.cn45-1347/r.2026.04.01

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 评价扶正化瘀胶囊联合恩替卡韦对慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者肝纤维化的治疗效果及二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)在疗效评价中的价值。方法 将93例CHB肝纤维化患者随机分为对照组(47例)、观察组(46例),对照组接受恩替卡韦治疗,观察组接受恩替卡韦联合扶正化瘀胶囊治疗,两组均治疗48周。分别于治疗前、治疗24周后、治疗48周后,收集两组影像学指标(2D-SWE弹性模量值)、实验室指标[丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、血小板计数],计算实验室衍生指标[纤维化-4指数(FIB-4)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值指数(APRI)、AST/ALT比值(AAR)],并行肝穿刺活检获取METAVIR评分结果(炎症活动度等级:G0~G3级;纤维化分期:S0~S4期)。比较两组各指标组内及组间差异,并采用Spearman相关分析及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线探讨2D-SWE弹性模量值及实验室衍生指标对肝纤维化分期的无创诊断价值。结果 (1)指标比较:①组间比较:治疗前,两组所有指标差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);治疗24周后,观察组血清ALT水平、APRI均低于对照组,血小板计数高于对照组(均P<0.05);治疗48周后,观察组血清ALT、AST水平及APRI均低于对照组(均P<0.05)。②组内比较:对照组治疗24周后的2D-SWE弹性模量值及治疗48周后的血清ALT、AST水平均低于治疗前(均P<0.05);观察组治疗24周后的FIB-4、APRI、2D-SWE弹性模量值及治疗48周后的血清ALT水平、血清AST水平、FIB-4、APRI、2D-SWE弹性模量值均低于治疗前,治疗48周后的血清ALT、AST水平及2D-SWE弹性模量值均低于治疗24周后(均P<0.05)。(2)炎症活动度及纤维化分期比较:治疗48周后,观察组纤维化分期优于对照组(P<0.05)。与治疗前比较,治疗24周后,对照组炎症活动度有所改善,观察组纤维化分期、炎症活动度均有所改善(均P<0.05);与治疗前及治疗24周后比较,治疗48周后,两组炎症活动度及纤维化分期均有所改善(均P<0.05)。(3)相关性:2D-SWE弹性模量值、FIB-4、APRI与炎症活动度及纤维化分期在各时间点均呈正相关(均P<0.05),AAR与炎症活动度及纤维化分期均无统计学意义上的相关性(均P>0.05)。(4)诊断效能:2D-SWE弹性模量值诊断肝纤维化各分期(S1~S4)的ROC 曲线下面积均较高(均>0.750),尤其是诊断S2、S4时,2D-SWE弹性模量值的ROC曲线下面积均≥0.900;2D-SWE弹性模量值联合FIB-4、APRI等实验室衍生指标后,诊断S2、S3、S4期的效能均较单独诊断时进一步提升。结论 扶正化瘀胶囊联合恩替卡韦治疗CHB肝纤维化,在降低肝脏硬度(2D-SWE弹性模量值)、改善肝纤维化分期方面优于单独使用恩替卡韦。在诊断CHB肝纤维化分期方面,2D-SWE弹性模量值联合FIB-4、APRI等实验室衍生指标具有较好的诊断效能。

Objective To evaluate the treatment effect of Fuzheng Huayu capsules combined with entecavir on liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and the value of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in therapeutic efficacy assessment. Methods A total of 93 CHB patients with liver fibrosis were randomly divided into a control group (n=47) or an observation group (n=46). The control group was treated with entecavir, while the observation group was treated with entecavir and Fuzheng Huayu capsules. Both groups were treated for 48 weeks. Before treatment, at 24 weeks after treatment, and at 48 weeks after treatment, imaging indicators (2D-SWE elastic modulus) and laboratory indicators (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], platelet count) were collected; laboratory-derived indices (fibrosis-4 index [FIB‑4], aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index [APRI], and AST/ALT ratio [AAR]) were calculated; liver biopsy was performed to obtain METAVIR scores (grade of inflammatory activity: G0-G3; fibrosis stage: S0-S4). Intra- and inter-group differences in indicators were compared, and Spearman correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to explore the non‑invasive diagnostic value of 2D-SWE elastic modulus and laboratory‑derived indices for liver fibrosis staging. Results (1) Comparison of indicators: ① Intergroup comparison: Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in all indicators between the two groups (all P>0.05); at 24 weeks after treatment, the serum ALT level and APRI in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, while its platelet count was higher (all P<0.05); at 48 weeks after treatment, serum ALT and AST levels, as well as APRI, in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). ② Intra-group comparison: In the control group, the 2D-SWE elastic modulus at 24 weeks after treatment and serum ALT and AST levels at 48 weeks after treatment were lower than those before treatment (all P<0.05). In the observation group, FIB-4, APRI, and 2D-SWE elastic modulus at 24 weeks after treatment, as well as serum ALT and AST levels, FIB-4, APRI, and 2D-SWE elastic modulus at 48 weeks after treatment, were lower than those before treatment; serum ALT and AST levels and 2D-SWE elastic modulus at 48 weeks after treatment were lower than those at 24 weeks after treatment (all P<0.05). (2)Comparison of inflammatory activity and fibrosis stage: At 48 weeks after treatment, fibrosis stage in the observation group was better than that in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with those before treatment, inflammatory activity was improved in the control group at 24 weeks after treatment, while both fibrosis stage and inflammatory activity were improved in the observation group (all P<0.05); compared with those before treatment and those at 24 weeks after treatment, inflammatory activity and fibrosis stage in both groups were improved at 48 weeks after treatment (all P<0.05). (3) Correlations: The 2D‑SWE elastic modulus, FIB‑4, and APRI were positively correlated with inflammatory activity and liver fibrosis stage at all time points (all P<0.05), whereas AAR showed no statistically significant correlation with inflammatory activity or fibrosis stage (all P>0.05). (4) Diagnostic performance: The areas under the ROC curves of 2D-SWE elastic modulus for diagnosing each fibrosis stage (S1-S4) were all relatively high (all >0.750), especially for S2 and S4 (the areas under the ROC curves were all ≥0.900). When 2D-SWE elastic modulus was combined with laboratory‑derived indices such as FIB-4 and APRI, the diagnostic performance for S2, S3, and S4 was further improved compared with 2D‑SWE elastic modulus alone. Conclusion Fuzheng Huayu capsules plus entecavir is superior to entecavir alone in reducing liver stiffness (2D‑SWE elastic modulus) and improving liver fibrosis stage in the treatment of CHB-related liver fibrosis. The combination of 2D‑SWE elastic modulus and laboratory-derived indices such as FIB-4 and APRI exhibits favorable diagnostic performance for staging of CHB-related liver fibrosis.

2

浏览量

0

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集