当前位置:首页 / 脑卒中后认知障碍患者家庭照护者决策疲劳现状及影响因素分析▲
| 更新时间:2026-09-14
|
脑卒中后认知障碍患者家庭照护者决策疲劳现状及影响因素分析▲
Analysis of the current status and influencing factors of decision-making fatigue among family caregivers of patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment

内科 页码:401-408

作者机构:1 南京医科大学附属老年医院康复医学科,江苏省南京市 210024;2 南京医科大学第一附属医院,江苏省南京市 210036

基金信息:江苏省残疾人事业发展研究课题(2024SC3103) 通信作者:纪婕

DOI:10.16121/j.cnki.cn45-1347/r.2026.04.05

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 调查脑卒中后认知障碍(PSCI)患者家庭照护者的决策疲劳现状,并分析其影响因素,为制定针对性干预措施提供参考。方法 采用便利抽样法,选取2023年1~12月在江苏省某三级甲等医院康复医学科就诊的290例PSCI患者的家庭照护者作为研究对象。采用一般资料调查表、中文版决策疲劳量表(DFS)、中文版决策冲突量表、中文版知觉压力量表(PSS)及社会支持评定量表(SSRS)对其进行调查。采用独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析、Pearson相关性分析及多重线性回归分析进行统计分析。结果 290名PSCI患者家庭照护者的中文版DFS得分为(15.17±3.59)分。不同年龄、性别、文化程度、PSCI了解程度、家庭人均月收入、职业状况、居住地的PSCI患者家庭照护者中文版DFS得分差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。Pearson相关性分析显示,PSCI患者家庭照护者中文版DFS得分与中文版DCS得分(r=0.243)、中文版PSS得分(r=0.268)均呈正相关,与SSRS得分(r=-0.328)及其主观支持维度得分(r=-0.426)、客观支持维度得分(r=-0.184)均呈负相关(均P<0.05)。多重线性回归分析显示,PSCI患者家庭照护者年龄(B=1.009)、性别(B=0.804)、文化程度(初中/中专/高中:B=-2.135;大专及以上:B=-2.033)、PSCI了解程度(B=0.874)、家庭人均月收入(3000~6000元:B=1.142)、职业状况(B=1.156)、居住地(B=1.004)、中文版PSS得分(B=0.093)及SSRS主观支持维度得分(B=-0.232)均是其决策疲劳的独立影响因素(均P<0.05)。结论 PSCI患者家庭照护者决策疲劳处于中等偏上水平。高龄、女性、文化程度较低、对PSCI不了解、家庭人均月收入中等、无稳定职业、农村居住、感知压力水平较高及主观支持水平较低的照护群体,其决策疲劳水平更高。医护人员应重点关注上述高危群体,通过降低感知压力、增强主观支持体验等措施,有效缓解决策疲劳,改善家庭照护者身心健康及决策质量。

Objective To investigate the current status of decision-making fatigue among family caregivers of patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), and to analyze its influencing factors, so as to provide references for developing targeted intervention measures. Methods With the convenience sampling method, a total of 290 family caregivers of PSCI patients who received treatment in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of a third-grade class-A hospital in Jiangsu Province from January to December 2023 were selected as research subjects. Investigations were conducted with the General Information Questionnaire, Chinese-version Decision Fatigue Scale (DFS), Chinese-version Decisional Conflict Scale, Chinese-version Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Chinese-version Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). Statistical analyses were performed via independent samples t-test, one-factor analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis. Results The Chinese-version DFS score of the 290 family caregivers of PSCI patients was (15.17±3.59). Statistically significant differences in Chinese-version DFS scores were found between family caregivers of PSCI patients with different age, gender, educational level, understanding of PSCI, per-capita monthly household income, occupational status, and place of residence (all P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis indicated that, in PSCI patients' family caregivers, the Chinese-version DFS score was positively correlated with the Chinese-version DCS score (r=0.243) and Chinese-version PSS score (r=0.268), and it was negatively correlated with the total SSRS score (r=-0.328), its subjective support dimension score (r=-0.426), and its objective support dimension score (r=-0.184) (all P<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that, for family caregivers of PSCI patients, their age (B=1.009), gender (B=0.804), educational level (junior high school / technical secondary school / senior high school: B=-2.135; junior college and above: B=-2.033), understanding of PSCI (B=0.874), per-capita monthly household income (3000-6000 CNY: B=1.142), occupational status (B=1.156), place of residence (B=1.004), Chinese-version PSS score (B=0.093), and subjective support dimension score of SSRS (B=-0.232) were independent influencing factors for the decision-making fatigue (all P<0.05). Conclusion Family caregivers of PSCI patients have an above average level of decision-making fatigue. Higher levels of decision-making fatigue are particularly associated with the following caregiver characteristics: advanced age, female gender, low educational level, limited understanding of PSCI, medium per-capita monthly household income, lack of stable occupation, rural residence, high perceived stress level, and low subjective support level. Medical staff should pay close attention to the above high-risk groups and use measures such as reducing perceived stress and improving subjective support experience to effectively alleviate decision-making fatigue and promote the physical and mental health as well as decision-making quality of family caregivers.

1

浏览量

0

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集