当前位置:首页 / 体重指数与白癜风的因果关系:基于GWAS数据的两样本孟德尔随机化分析▲
大数据与生物信息学 | 更新时间:2025-12-15
|
体重指数与白癜风的因果关系:基于GWAS数据的两样本孟德尔随机化分析▲
Causal relationship between body mass index and vitiligo: a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis based on GWAS data

内科 页码:529-537

作者机构:广西壮族自治区南溪山医院皮肤科性病科,桂林市 541002

基金信息:▲基金项目:广西壮族自治区中医药管理局自筹经费科研课题(GXZYC20240258);广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题(Z-C20220188;Z-C20230189) 通信作者:刘懿

DOI:10.16121/j.cnki.cn45-1347/r.2025.05.12

  • 中文简介
  • 英文简介
  • 参考文献

目的 采用两样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析方法探讨体重指数(BMI)与白癜风之间的因果关系。方法 本研究是一项基于全基因组关联研究汇总数据的两样本MR分析。暴露数据(BMI, n=339 224)与结局数据(白癜风, n=337 159)均来源于欧洲人群。工具变量的筛选标准:(1)选取与BMI在全基因组水平上显著相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)(P<5×10⁻⁸); (2)对初筛SNP进行连锁不平衡过滤(r2<0.001,物理距离>10 000 kb);(3)使用PhenoScanner数据库(v2)检索每个SNP的关联表型,剔除与已知混杂因素(如神经系统疾病、情绪障碍、睡眠状况等)显著相关的SNP。采用随机效应逆方差加权(IVW)、MR Egger回归、加权中位数估计(WME)、简单模式和加权模式共五种MR分析方法对BMI与白癜风的因果关系进行研究;采用Cochran Q检验评估异质性,以MR Egger回归中的截距项检验评估水平多效性,使用“留一法”进行敏感性分析。结果 五种MR分析方法的结果均显示BMI与白癜风无统计学意义上的因果关系(均P>0.05),其中随机效应IVW法得到的OR=1.000 1(95%CI:0.999 6~1.000 6),MR Egger回归法得到的OR=1.000 5(95%CI:0.999 1~1.001 8),WME法得到的OR=1.000 1(95%CI:0.999 5~1.000 8),简单模式法得到的OR=1.000 2(95%CI:0.998 7~1.001 8),加权模式法得到的OR=1.000 2(95%CI:0.999 0~1.001 4)。Cochran Q检验结果显示,与BMI强相关的SNP间无统计学意义上的异质性(P>0.05)。MR Egger回归的截距项检验结果显示,与BMI强相关的SNP不存在水平多效性(P>0.05)。“留一法”敏感性分析结果显示,逐一剔除SNP后,IVW分析结果无明显改变。结论 本研究未发现BMI与白癜风之间存在遗传层面的因果关联。

Objective To explore the causal relationship between body mass index (BMI) and vitiligo using the two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis method. Methods This study was a two-sample MR analysis based on summary data from a genome-wide association study. The exposure data (BMI, n=339,224) and outcome data (vitiligo, n=337,159) were both derived from the European population. The screening criteria for instrumental variables were as follows: (1) Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with BMI at the genome-wide level (P<5×10-8) were selected; (2) Linkage disequilibrium filtering was performed on the initially screened SNPs (r2<0.001, physical distance>10,000 kb); (3) The PhenoScanner database (v2) was used to retrieve the associated phenotypes of each SNP, and SNPs significantly associated with known confounding factors (such as neurological diseases, mood disorders, sleep status, etc.) were excluded. Five MR analysis methods, including random-effects inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR Egger regression, weighted median estimator (WME), simple mode, and weighted mode, were used to study the causal relationship between BMI and vitiligo. Cochran's Q test was used to assess heterogeneity, the intercept term test in MR Egger regression was used to evaluate horizontal pleiotropy, and a "leave-one-out" method was used for sensitivity analysis. Results The results of all five MR analysis methods showed no statistically significant causal relationship between BMI and vitiligo (all P>0.05). Specifically, the OR obtained by the random-effects IVW method was 1.000 1 (95% CI: 0.999 6-1.000 6); the OR from MR Egger regression was 1.000 5 (95% CI: 0.999 1-1.001 8); the OR via WME was 1.000 1 (95% CI: 0.999 5-1.000 8); the OR using the simple mode was 1.000 2 (95% CI: 0.998 7-1.001 8); and the OR from the weighted mode was 1.000 2 (95% CI: 0.999 0-1.001 4). The results of Cochran's Q test showed no statistically significant heterogeneity among SNPs strongly associated with BMI (P>0.05). The intercept term test results of MR Egger regression indicated no horizontal pleiotropy in SNPs strongly associated with BMI (P>0.05). The results of the "leave-one-out" sensitivity analysis showed that after excluding SNPs one by one, the IVW analysis results did not change significantly. Conclusion No genetic-level causal relationship between BMI and vitiligo was found in this study.

123

浏览量

24

下载量

0

CSCD

工具集